freeBSD or Linux for internet server?
the one u now better, i suppose.
i prefer linux)
i prefer linux)
да ты еще и по-таиландски шпареш
OpenSolaris because solaris containers.
> Web Cache Proxy(Squid)
Squid isn't kosher. See Varnish.
As for the original question, use what you know better.
(I wouldn't use neither.)
---
"NetBSD is JIHBED!"
Squid isn't kosher. See Varnish.
As for the original question, use what you know better.
(I wouldn't use neither.)
---
"NetBSD is JIHBED!"
linux
I personally would recommend Linux since it
a) has a wider variety of supported platforms and hardware
b) provides better perfomance, scalability and reliability
c) is supported by commercial companies, like RedHat or Novell, where you could claim technicall support
d) is able to run more third-party software poducts.
a) has a wider variety of supported platforms and hardware
b) provides better perfomance, scalability and reliability
c) is supported by commercial companies, like RedHat or Novell, where you could claim technicall support
d) is able to run more third-party software poducts.
> b) provides better perfomance, scalability and reliability
не пизди
не пизди
> не пизди
не ревнуй
не ревнуй
> I personally would recommend Linux since it
> a) has a wider variety of supported platforms and hardware
How is this relevant here?
> b) provides better perfomance, scalability and reliability
Dubious statement at the very least.
> c) is supported by commercial companies, like RedHat or Novell,
> where you could claim technicall support
Can you share success story of asking for their support for
private use (not corporate one)?
NetBSD is supported by Force10 which is telecomm company
producing solutions for data centres.
FreeBSD is supported by Juniper which is telecomm company,
the name tells you all.
What technological achievements do Red Hat or Novell have
that make them so distinguished?
> d) is able to run more third-party software poducts.
Except for one source-based system, this is outdated or obsolete software.
What does it buy you?
Right, we have pkgsrc on Linux too, but then you go better with NetBSD.
---
Q9: А почему Линукс не ОС?
A9: ОС - это БЗДя
> a) has a wider variety of supported platforms and hardware
How is this relevant here?
> b) provides better perfomance, scalability and reliability
Dubious statement at the very least.
> c) is supported by commercial companies, like RedHat or Novell,
> where you could claim technicall support
Can you share success story of asking for their support for
private use (not corporate one)?
NetBSD is supported by Force10 which is telecomm company
producing solutions for data centres.
FreeBSD is supported by Juniper which is telecomm company,
the name tells you all.
What technological achievements do Red Hat or Novell have
that make them so distinguished?
> d) is able to run more third-party software poducts.
Except for one source-based system, this is outdated or obsolete software.
What does it buy you?
Right, we have pkgsrc on Linux too, but then you go better with NetBSD.
---
Q9: А почему Линукс не ОС?
A9: ОС - это БЗДя
Miscrosoft Windows is the only answer. It's global and reliable.
Оставить комментарий
Lynx
Would you recommend which OS (freeBSD or Linux) I can use for Gateway/Firewall/NAT/DHCP/DNS/Web Cache Proxy(Squid)/File sharing(NFS, samba)/PPPoE/Mail/Web servers?