Выбрать PCI SATA controller

Chupa

Нужно купить сабж.
Какие они бывают (в первую очередь производители и чипы как работают в линухе?
Откуда брать питание для SATA? С контроллера или как-то ещё?

Usmanova72

Бери любой - они все одинаковые. Питание из блока питания будет.

abrek

Serial ATA (SATA) for Linux
status report
Feb 25, 2004
Hardware support
================
Intel ICH5 and ICH5-R
---------------------
Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with a few added,
non-standard SATA port controls. Hardware does not support hotplug.
"Coldplug" support is potentially feasible.
libata driver status: Production, but see issue drivers/ide driver status: Production, but see issue Issue Depending on BIOS settings, IDE driver may lock up computer
when probing drives.
Issue Excessive interrupts are seen in some configurations.
Issue "Enhanced mode" or "SATA-only mode" may need to be set in BIOS.
Issue Driver disables SATA port on unload, but does not re-enable
SATA port on load.
Intel ICH6 ("AHCI")
-------------------
Summary: Per-device queues, full SATA control including hotplug
and PM.
libata driver status: "looks like ICH5" support available in ata_piix
very soon. Full support available in a week or two.
Promise TX2/TX4/SX4
-------------------
Summary: Per-host queues on all controllers. Full SATA control
including hotplug and PM on all but one controller.
libata driver status: Beta, but see issue Issue Some boards appear to have PATA as well as SATA ports. PATA
is not currently supported, and no plans have yet been made to rectify
this. Ideally drivers/ide would drive PATA, but if they are the same
PCI device, that would not be feasible.
Silicon Image 3112/3114
-----------------------
Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with full SATA
control including hotplug and PM.
libata driver status: Alpha.
drivers/ide driver status: Production, but see issue Issue Need to have the most recent fixes posted to lkml, for stable
operation and full performance (where possible).
Silicon Image 3124
------------------
Soon, hopefully. User-written.
Broadcom/ServerWorks/Apple
--------------------------
Summary: Huge per-device queues, full SATA control including hotplug
and PM.
libata driver status: Beta.
VIA
---
Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with full SATA
control including hotplug and PM.
libata driver status: Beta.
SiS
---
libata driver status: in progress (user-written)
Vitesse
-------
libata driver status: in progress
Marvell
-------
libata driver status: in progress

Software support
================
Basic Serial ATA support
------------------------
The "ATA host state machine", the core of the entire driver, is
considered production-stable.
The error handling is _very_ simple, but at this stage that is an
advantage. Error handling code anywhere is inevitably both complex and
sorely under-tested. libata error handling is intentionally simple.
Positives: Easy to review and verify correctness. Never data
corruption. Negatives: if an error occurs, libata will simply send
the error back the block layer. There are limited retries by the block
layer, depending on the type of error, but there is never a bus reset.
Or in other words: "it's better to stop talking to the disk than
compound existing problems with further problems."
As Serial ATA matures, and host- and device-side errata become apparent,
the error handling will be slowly refined. I am planning to work with a
few (kind!) disk vendors, to obtain special drives/firmwares that allow
me to inject faults, and otherwise exercise error handling code.
Queueing support
----------------
Even though some SATA host controllers on the market already support
command queueing (a.k.a. "TCQ" libata does not yet support it.
However, libata was designed from the ground-up to support queueing, so
I need only change a few lines of code, and write two functions, to
enable this behavior.
Queueing will be enabled in libata soon, but to do so requires a long
stretch of testing on a large variety of controllers and drives. This
is very time-intensive, and is the largest part of this task.
Tangent: Host-based queueing and Native Command Queueing
Queueing is the process of sending multiple commands to a single device,
without waiting for prior commands to finish. This increases
performance and reduces latency. There are three types of queueing in
the ATA world:
1) "legacy TCQ" -- some PATA devices support this. Just ignore it,
it's going away.
2) "host-based TCQ" -- the host controller supports a queue of drive
commands, whether or not the drive supports it.
3) "Native Command Queueing" -- both host and drive cooperate in the
queueing and execution of drive commands. This should provide the
highest performance and lowest latency of all three options.
is support by drivers/ide _only_. libata will not support this.
will soon be supported by libata.
will be supported by libata when hardware is available from drive
manufacturers.
Hotplug support
---------------
All SATA is hotplug.
libata does not support hotplug... yet.
Power Management support
------------------------
Over and above the power management specified in the ATA/ATAPI
specification, one can aggressively control the power consumption of
SATA hosts, the SATA bus, and the SATA device.
SMART support
-------------
Soon. Requires the capability to directly submit ATA commands from
userspace to the low-level device, which must be added with care.

bonnyboo

гыгы, линукс - говно

eee1

сам ты - говно

Chupa

Я правильно понимаю, что всё noname ценой около 20уёв на price.ru - это Sil3112?
Стоят ли бонусы Promise TX2 (PDC20375) по сравнению с Sil3112 разницы в 20уёв?

abrek

Не знаю.
Я не вижу смысла в SATA без NCQ, если это не 3ware на 8 и больше портов, когда тонкий шлейф реальную разницу даст.
Поэтому не вникал в детали.
Оставить комментарий
Имя или ник:
Комментарий: